Compare AI tools

	Claude S	Claude Code S	Gemini A	Figma AI A
Tagline	Anthropic's flagship — best reasoning + longest useful context.	Anthropic's CLI agent. Opus-powered, operates on your repo directly.	Google's answer. Best integrated with Workspace + free for a lot.	AI features baked into the design tool you already use.
Category	Chatbots	Coding	Chatbots	Design
Pricing	Free + $20/mo Pro + team/enterprise	Part of Claude Pro/Max/Team plans	Free + $20/mo Advanced (bundled with 2TB Drive)	Included with Figma plans
Best for	Long writing, code, careful thinking, documents over 50 pages.	Developers who want an agent, not autocomplete. Large refactors, tests, docs.	Anyone already on Google, research tasks, summarizing long documents.	Designers already on Figma.
Strengths	Best-in-class writing + nuanced reasoning 1M context on Opus Artifacts for code/docs Lowest hallucination rate in my testing	Runs locally, edits your actual files Strong on large codebases with 1M context Great at multi-step tasks	Native Google Workspace integration Very long context (1M+) Deep Research feature Free tier is generous	First drafts with Make Designs Rename/rearrange layers automatically Natural language asset search
Weaknesses	Image generation is weak No native web search on all tiers	Terminal-based — learning curve Can't be used without Claude subscription	Writing quality trails Claude Over-refusals on edge content UI is cluttered	Features vary by plan + region Still rolling out
Kai's verdict	S-tier for reasoning and writing. If you only pay for one chatbot, pay for this one — especially for long work.	S-tier if you live in the terminal. Different shape than Cursor — complementary, not replacement.	A-tier. The Deep Research feature is genuinely useful. Don't sleep on it if you're already paying Google.	A-tier. No reason not to use it if you're on Figma. Not worth switching for.
Link	Open →	Open →	Open →	Open →