Compare AI tools

	Claude S	Claude Code S	Sora A	Figma AI A
Tagline	Anthropic's flagship — best reasoning + longest useful context.	Anthropic's CLI agent. Opus-powered, operates on your repo directly.	OpenAI's video model. Long clips, cinematic quality.	AI features baked into the design tool you already use.
Category	Chatbots	Coding	Video	Design
Pricing	Free + $20/mo Pro + team/enterprise	Part of Claude Pro/Max/Team plans	Included with ChatGPT Plus/Pro	Included with Figma plans
Best for	Long writing, code, careful thinking, documents over 50 pages.	Developers who want an agent, not autocomplete. Large refactors, tests, docs.	ChatGPT subscribers experimenting with cinematic shots.	Designers already on Figma.
Strengths	Best-in-class writing + nuanced reasoning 1M context on Opus Artifacts for code/docs Lowest hallucination rate in my testing	Runs locally, edits your actual files Strong on large codebases with 1M context Great at multi-step tasks	Up to 20-sec clips at 1080p Strong physics + scene composition Storyboard feature for longer narratives Remix existing videos	First drafts with Make Designs Rename/rearrange layers automatically Natural language asset search
Weaknesses	Image generation is weak No native web search on all tiers	Terminal-based — learning curve Can't be used without Claude subscription	Stricter content policy than competitors Hit-or-miss on complex motion Text-in-video still struggles	Features vary by plan + region Still rolling out
Kai's verdict	S-tier for reasoning and writing. If you only pay for one chatbot, pay for this one — especially for long work.	S-tier if you live in the terminal. Different shape than Cursor — complementary, not replacement.	A-tier. Amazing when it works, frustrating when it doesn't. Runway still more reliable for pros.	A-tier. No reason not to use it if you're on Figma. Not worth switching for.
Link	Open →	Open →	Open →	Open →