Compare AI tools

	Claude S	Gemini A	Claude Code S	Galileo AI B
Tagline	Anthropic's flagship — best reasoning + longest useful context.	Google's answer. Best integrated with Workspace + free for a lot.	Anthropic's CLI agent. Opus-powered, operates on your repo directly.	Prompt to UI design. Figma-ready outputs.
Category	Chatbots	Chatbots	Coding	Design
Pricing	Free + $20/mo Pro + team/enterprise	Free + $20/mo Advanced (bundled with 2TB Drive)	Part of Claude Pro/Max/Team plans	Free trial + paid plans
Best for	Long writing, code, careful thinking, documents over 50 pages.	Anyone already on Google, research tasks, summarizing long documents.	Developers who want an agent, not autocomplete. Large refactors, tests, docs.	Designers brainstorming first drafts.
Strengths	Best-in-class writing + nuanced reasoning 1M context on Opus Artifacts for code/docs Lowest hallucination rate in my testing	Native Google Workspace integration Very long context (1M+) Deep Research feature Free tier is generous	Runs locally, edits your actual files Strong on large codebases with 1M context Great at multi-step tasks	Prompt-to-UI with real layouts Exports to Figma Faster than hand-designing from scratch
Weaknesses	Image generation is weak No native web search on all tiers	Writing quality trails Claude Over-refusals on edge content UI is cluttered	Terminal-based — learning curve Can't be used without Claude subscription	Output needs designer polish Pricing unclear / changes often
Kai's verdict	S-tier for reasoning and writing. If you only pay for one chatbot, pay for this one — especially for long work.	A-tier. The Deep Research feature is genuinely useful. Don't sleep on it if you're already paying Google.	S-tier if you live in the terminal. Different shape than Cursor — complementary, not replacement.	B-tier. Useful for first drafts. v0 is the better bet for shipping code.
Link	Open →	Open →	Open →	Open →