Compare AI tools

	Claude S	GitHub Copilot B	Skye A	Gemini A
Tagline	Anthropic's flagship — best reasoning + longest useful context.	Microsoft/GitHub's autocomplete. Deep VS Code + JetBrains integration.	An agentic iPhone home screen that replaces your static icon grid with AI widgets that proactively surface health, calendar, finance, and local context — without you having to open a single app.	Google's answer. Best integrated with Workspace + free for a lot.
Category	Chatbots	Coding	Agents	Chatbots
Pricing	Free + $20/mo Pro + team/enterprise	Free (limited) + $10/mo Pro + $19/mo Business	Waitlist / Beta (pricing not yet disclosed)	Free + $20/mo Advanced (bundled with 2TB Drive)
Best for	Long writing, code, careful thinking, documents over 50 pages.	Teams with GitHub already. Devs who don't want to change IDEs.	iPhone power users who are frustrated that Siri is still reactive and want their home screen to actually anticipate their day.	Anyone already on Google, research tasks, summarizing long documents.
Strengths	Best-in-class writing + nuanced reasoning 1M context on Opus Artifacts for code/docs Lowest hallucination rate in my testing	Great enterprise story Works in your existing IDE Chat + autocomplete	Ambient, proactive intelligence delivered via native iOS widgets — no app-switching required Cross-domain context: health, calendar, email, finances, and local recommendations in one layer Works within iOS permission model (no jailbreak or sideloading), making App Store approval plausible Strong pre-launch signal: 25k+ waitlist and backing from a16z, True Ventures, and SV Angel	Native Google Workspace integration Very long context (1M+) Deep Research feature Free tier is generous
Weaknesses	Image generation is weak No native web search on all tiers	Less agentic than Cursor/Claude Code Model quality varies	Still pre-launch / beta — zero proven track record and no public pricing yet iPhone-only by design, which immediately locks out half the smartphone market Battery drain and privacy concerns from constant ambient context scanning are real and unresolved	Writing quality trails Claude Over-refusals on edge content UI is cluttered
Kai's verdict	S-tier for reasoning and writing. If you only pay for one chatbot, pay for this one — especially for long work.	B-tier. Solid for autocomplete but the category moved past it. Pick Cursor unless you can't.	The concept is genuinely compelling — turning the home screen into a living AI layer is a smarter bet than yet another chat interface — but this is vaporware until it ships publicly and we see whether Apple's sandbox lets it breathe. (Verdict pending Phi's full review.)	A-tier. The Deep Research feature is genuinely useful. Don't sleep on it if you're already paying Google.
Link	Open →	Open →	Open →	Open →