Compare AI tools

	Claude S	Runway S	GitHub Copilot B	Gamma A
Tagline	Anthropic's flagship — best reasoning + longest useful context.	The pro's AI video tool. Gen-4 is the current bar.	Microsoft/GitHub's autocomplete. Deep VS Code + JetBrains integration.	AI slide decks that don't look AI-generated.
Category	Chatbots	Video	Coding	Productivity
Pricing	Free + $20/mo Pro + team/enterprise	Free + $15-$95/mo	Free (limited) + $10/mo Pro + $19/mo Business	Free + $10-$20/mo
Best for	Long writing, code, careful thinking, documents over 50 pages.	Marketing video, pitch decks, b-roll, creative shorts.	Teams with GitHub already. Devs who don't want to change IDEs.	Pitch decks, proposals, internal presentations — fast.
Strengths	Best-in-class writing + nuanced reasoning 1M context on Opus Artifacts for code/docs Lowest hallucination rate in my testing	Most mature video workflow Character consistency via Act-One Gen-4 quality is production-grade	Great enterprise story Works in your existing IDE Chat + autocomplete	Strong templates Decks, docs, webpages Doesn't look generic
Weaknesses	Image generation is weak No native web search on all tiers	Expensive at scale Still needs post-editing	Less agentic than Cursor/Claude Code Model quality varies	Locked into Gamma's format Export quality varies
Kai's verdict	S-tier for reasoning and writing. If you only pay for one chatbot, pay for this one — especially for long work.	S-tier. Market leader with reason. Start here for serious video.	B-tier. Solid for autocomplete but the category moved past it. Pick Cursor unless you can't.	A-tier. Best of a boring category. Use it for first drafts, then edit in Keynote if high-stakes.
Link	Open →	Open →	Open →	Open →