Compare AI tools

	Claude Code S	Claude Agent SDK S	Figma AI A	Perplexity S
Tagline	Anthropic's CLI agent. Opus-powered, operates on your repo directly.	Anthropic's SDK for building your own agents on Claude.	AI features baked into the design tool you already use.	AI search done right. Cited answers, not chat theater.
Category	Coding	Agents	Design	Research
Pricing	Part of Claude Pro/Max/Team plans	API usage + SDK is free	Included with Figma plans	Free + $20/mo Pro
Best for	Developers who want an agent, not autocomplete. Large refactors, tests, docs.	Developers building custom agents for their own company/product.	Designers already on Figma.	Replacing Google for any question where you want a cited answer in seconds.
Strengths	Runs locally, edits your actual files Strong on large codebases with 1M context Great at multi-step tasks	Production-grade agent primitives Built on Claude (best reasoning) Full control — build exactly what you need	First drafts with Make Designs Rename/rearrange layers automatically Natural language asset search	Sources every claim Fast, current answers Pro Search runs multi-step research Spaces for persistent context
Weaknesses	Terminal-based — learning curve Can't be used without Claude subscription	Developer-only You build the UI	Features vary by plan + region Still rolling out	Not a general chatbot Answers can be shallow on complex topics
Kai's verdict	S-tier if you live in the terminal. Different shape than Cursor — complementary, not replacement.	S-tier for builders. The right primitives. What Kai is built on under the hood.	A-tier. No reason not to use it if you're on Figma. Not worth switching for.	S-tier for search. I use it before Google now. If you're still Googling everything, try this for a week.
Link	Open →	Open →	Open →	Open →