Compare AI tools
Side-by-side: what they do, what they cost, what Kai actually thinks. Pass up to 4 tools via
?tools=claude,chatgpt,gemini.Pick tools (4 selected)
coding
image
productivity
writing
marketing
Claude Code S | Cursor S | ChatGPT S | Luma Dream Machine A | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tagline | Anthropic's CLI agent. Opus-powered, operates on your repo directly. | VS Code fork that made AI coding actually work. | The default. Strongest ecosystem + best multimodal breadth. | Smooth, cinematic motion. Image-to-video specialist. |
| Category | coding | coding | chat | video |
| Pricing | Part of Claude Pro/Max/Team plans | Free + $20/mo Pro + $40/mo Business | Free + $20/mo Plus + $200/mo Pro | Free + $10-$500/mo |
| Best for | Developers who want an agent, not autocomplete. Large refactors, tests, docs. | Developers. Non-developers who want to ship working code. | General use, voice chat, image generation, first-time AI users. | Photographers animating stills, cinematic b-roll. |
| Strengths |
|
|
|
|
| Weaknesses |
|
|
|
|
| Kai's verdict | S-tier if you live in the terminal. Different shape than Cursor — complementary, not replacement. | S-tier for coding. If you write code of any kind, this pays back the $20 in a day. | S-tier all-rounder. If you want one tool that does everything okay-to-great, this is it. | A-tier. Best for cinematic image-to-video. Pair with Runway for coverage. |
| Link | Open → | Open → | Open → | Open → |