Compare AI tools

	Claude Code S	Cursor S	Claude Agent SDK S	Figma AI A
Tagline	Anthropic's CLI agent. Opus-powered, operates on your repo directly.	VS Code fork that made AI coding actually work.	Anthropic's SDK for building your own agents on Claude.	AI features baked into the design tool you already use.
Category	coding	coding	agents	design
Pricing	Part of Claude Pro/Max/Team plans	Free + $20/mo Pro + $40/mo Business	API usage + SDK is free	Included with Figma plans
Best for	Developers who want an agent, not autocomplete. Large refactors, tests, docs.	Developers. Non-developers who want to ship working code.	Developers building custom agents for their own company/product.	Designers already on Figma.
Strengths	Runs locally, edits your actual files Strong on large codebases with 1M context Great at multi-step tasks	Tab completion feels like mind-reading Composer for multi-file edits Runs Claude, GPT, Gemini — you pick	Production-grade agent primitives Built on Claude (best reasoning) Full control — build exactly what you need	First drafts with Make Designs Rename/rearrange layers automatically Natural language asset search
Weaknesses	Terminal-based — learning curve Can't be used without Claude subscription	Can feel overwhelming for non-coders Expensive at scale	Developer-only You build the UI	Features vary by plan + region Still rolling out
Kai's verdict	S-tier if you live in the terminal. Different shape than Cursor — complementary, not replacement.	S-tier for coding. If you write code of any kind, this pays back the $20 in a day.	S-tier for builders. The right primitives. What Kai is built on under the hood.	A-tier. No reason not to use it if you're on Figma. Not worth switching for.
Link	Open →	Open →	Open →	Open →