Compare AI tools

	Claude Code S	Cursor S	Elicit S	Galileo AI B
Tagline	Anthropic's CLI agent. Opus-powered, operates on your repo directly.	VS Code fork that made AI coding actually work.	AI research assistant for academic literature.	Prompt to UI design. Figma-ready outputs.
Category	coding	coding	research	design
Pricing	Part of Claude Pro/Max/Team plans	Free + $20/mo Pro + $40/mo Business	Free + $12-$42/mo	Free trial + paid plans
Best for	Developers who want an agent, not autocomplete. Large refactors, tests, docs.	Developers. Non-developers who want to ship working code.	Grad students, researchers, anyone doing literature reviews.	Designers brainstorming first drafts.
Strengths	Runs locally, edits your actual files Strong on large codebases with 1M context Great at multi-step tasks	Tab completion feels like mind-reading Composer for multi-file edits Runs Claude, GPT, Gemini — you pick	Searches 125M+ papers Extracts + synthesizes findings across papers Systematic review workflow	Prompt-to-UI with real layouts Exports to Figma Faster than hand-designing from scratch
Weaknesses	Terminal-based — learning curve Can't be used without Claude subscription	Can feel overwhelming for non-coders Expensive at scale	Academic-only Can hallucinate citations — verify everything	Output needs designer polish Pricing unclear / changes often
Kai's verdict	S-tier if you live in the terminal. Different shape than Cursor — complementary, not replacement.	S-tier for coding. If you write code of any kind, this pays back the $20 in a day.	S-tier for academic research. Nothing else comes close for systematic reviews.	B-tier. Useful for first drafts. v0 is the better bet for shipping code.
Link	Open →	Open →	Open →	Open →