Compare AI tools

	Claude Code S	Cursor S	Figma AI A	Hume AI A
Tagline	Anthropic's CLI agent. Opus-powered, operates on your repo directly.	VS Code fork that made AI coding actually work.	AI features baked into the design tool you already use.	Voice AI that reads + expresses emotion.
Category	Coding	Coding	Design	Voice
Pricing	Part of Claude Pro/Max/Team plans	Free + $20/mo Pro + $40/mo Business	Included with Figma plans	Free tier + pay-as-you-go
Best for	Developers who want an agent, not autocomplete. Large refactors, tests, docs.	Developers. Non-developers who want to ship working code.	Designers already on Figma.	Therapy apps, customer service, any voice agent where emotion matters.
Strengths	Runs locally, edits your actual files Strong on large codebases with 1M context Great at multi-step tasks	Tab completion feels like mind-reading Composer for multi-file edits Runs Claude, GPT, Gemini — you pick	First drafts with Make Designs Rename/rearrange layers automatically Natural language asset search	Detects + mirrors emotional tone EVI (Empathic Voice Interface) feels different Expressive voice output
Weaknesses	Terminal-based — learning curve Can't be used without Claude subscription	Can feel overwhelming for non-coders Expensive at scale	Features vary by plan + region Still rolling out	Niche use case Pricing ramps fast
Kai's verdict	S-tier if you live in the terminal. Different shape than Cursor — complementary, not replacement.	S-tier for coding. If you write code of any kind, this pays back the $20 in a day.	A-tier. No reason not to use it if you're on Figma. Not worth switching for.	A-tier in its niche. The only one that actually gets emotion right.
Link	Open →	Open →	Open →	Open →