Compare AI tools

	Claude Code S	Cursor S	Adobe Firefly A	Qwen A
Tagline	Anthropic's CLI agent. Opus-powered, operates on your repo directly.	VS Code fork that made AI coding actually work.	Commercially safe image gen, deeply integrated with Photoshop.	Alibaba's open chat model. Multilingual + agentic.
Category	coding	coding	image	chat
Pricing	Part of Claude Pro/Max/Team plans	Free + $20/mo Pro + $40/mo Business	Free + included with Creative Cloud	Free web + API
Best for	Developers who want an agent, not autocomplete. Large refactors, tests, docs.	Developers. Non-developers who want to ship working code.	Anyone in Creative Cloud. Brands that need copyright clarity.	Vietnamese/Chinese content, SEA multilingual use, developers wanting open-weight tool-use.
Strengths	Runs locally, edits your actual files Strong on large codebases with 1M context Great at multi-step tasks	Tab completion feels like mind-reading Composer for multi-file edits Runs Claude, GPT, Gemini — you pick	Trained on licensed content — commercially safe Generative Fill in Photoshop is incredible Native to Adobe ecosystem	Excellent Chinese + Vietnamese + SEA languages Strong at tool-use + agentic workflows Open weights (Qwen2.5, Qwen3)
Weaknesses	Terminal-based — learning curve Can't be used without Claude subscription	Can feel overwhelming for non-coders Expensive at scale	Aesthetic ceiling below Midjourney Tied to Adobe subscription	English quality behind Claude/GPT Less well-known outside Asia
Kai's verdict	S-tier if you live in the terminal. Different shape than Cursor — complementary, not replacement.	S-tier for coding. If you write code of any kind, this pays back the $20 in a day.	S-tier inside Photoshop (Generative Fill). B-tier standalone.	A-tier. The best open model for Vietnamese + Chinese. Don't sleep on it if you work in SEA.
Link	Open →	Open →	Open →	Open →