Compare AI tools

	Claude Code S	Cursor S	Galileo AI B	Cartesia S
Tagline	Anthropic's CLI agent. Opus-powered, operates on your repo directly.	VS Code fork that made AI coding actually work.	Prompt to UI design. Figma-ready outputs.	Ultra-low-latency voice. Built for realtime agents.
Category	coding	coding	design	voice
Pricing	Part of Claude Pro/Max/Team plans	Free + $20/mo Pro + $40/mo Business	Free trial + paid plans	Free tier + usage-based API
Best for	Developers who want an agent, not autocomplete. Large refactors, tests, docs.	Developers. Non-developers who want to ship working code.	Designers brainstorming first drafts.	Developers building voice agents, phone bots, interactive apps.
Strengths	Runs locally, edits your actual files Strong on large codebases with 1M context Great at multi-step tasks	Tab completion feels like mind-reading Composer for multi-file edits Runs Claude, GPT, Gemini — you pick	Prompt-to-UI with real layouts Exports to Figma Faster than hand-designing from scratch	< 90ms latency — the fastest in the market Sonic model sounds natural Developer-friendly API
Weaknesses	Terminal-based — learning curve Can't be used without Claude subscription	Can feel overwhelming for non-coders Expensive at scale	Output needs designer polish Pricing unclear / changes often	Fewer voices than ElevenLabs Less consumer-facing brand
Kai's verdict	S-tier if you live in the terminal. Different shape than Cursor — complementary, not replacement.	S-tier for coding. If you write code of any kind, this pays back the $20 in a day.	B-tier. Useful for first drafts. v0 is the better bet for shipping code.	S-tier for realtime. If latency matters more than voice catalog, start here.
Link	Open →	Open →	Open →	Open →