Compare AI tools

	Claude Code S	DALL-E 3 B	Claude S	Figma AI A
Tagline	Anthropic's CLI agent. Opus-powered, operates on your repo directly.	OpenAI's image model. Built into ChatGPT Plus.	Anthropic's flagship — best reasoning + longest useful context.	AI features baked into the design tool you already use.
Category	Coding	Image	Chatbots	Design
Pricing	Part of Claude Pro/Max/Team plans	Included with ChatGPT Plus $20/mo	Free + $20/mo Pro + team/enterprise	Included with Figma plans
Best for	Developers who want an agent, not autocomplete. Large refactors, tests, docs.	ChatGPT Plus users who want images without paying extra.	Long writing, code, careful thinking, documents over 50 pages.	Designers already on Figma.
Strengths	Runs locally, edits your actual files Strong on large codebases with 1M context Great at multi-step tasks	Excellent prompt understanding Built into ChatGPT — no extra subscription Good at composition + concepts	Best-in-class writing + nuanced reasoning 1M context on Opus Artifacts for code/docs Lowest hallucination rate in my testing	First drafts with Make Designs Rename/rearrange layers automatically Natural language asset search
Weaknesses	Terminal-based — learning curve Can't be used without Claude subscription	Aesthetic ceiling below Midjourney + Ideogram Text rendering worse than Ideogram No fine control	Image generation is weak No native web search on all tiers	Features vary by plan + region Still rolling out
Kai's verdict	S-tier if you live in the terminal. Different shape than Cursor — complementary, not replacement.	B-tier standalone, A-tier value if you already pay ChatGPT. Don't pay for it separately.	S-tier for reasoning and writing. If you only pay for one chatbot, pay for this one — especially for long work.	A-tier. No reason not to use it if you're on Figma. Not worth switching for.
Link	Open →	Open →	Open →	Open →