Compare AI tools

	Claude Code S	Figma AI A	HeyGen S	Kling A
Tagline	Anthropic's CLI agent. Opus-powered, operates on your repo directly.	AI features baked into the design tool you already use.	AI avatar videos. Record once, speak any language.	Kuaishou's video model. The surprise standout.
Category	Coding	Design	Video	Video
Pricing	Part of Claude Pro/Max/Team plans	Included with Figma plans	Free + $24-$65/mo	Credit-based, free trial
Best for	Developers who want an agent, not autocomplete. Large refactors, tests, docs.	Designers already on Figma.	Course creators, multilingual marketers, anyone scaling video content.	Anyone who wants top-tier video quality for less.
Strengths	Runs locally, edits your actual files Strong on large codebases with 1M context Great at multi-step tasks	First drafts with Make Designs Rename/rearrange layers automatically Natural language asset search	Clone your face + voice in 2 minutes Instant translation into 40+ languages with lip sync Avatars look less uncanny than competitors	Very strong motion + physics Often beats Runway on realism Great price
Weaknesses	Terminal-based — learning curve Can't be used without Claude subscription	Features vary by plan + region Still rolling out	Pricey for serious volume Long shots still feel off Ethics — easy to misuse	UX is rough for English speakers Queue times
Kai's verdict	S-tier if you live in the terminal. Different shape than Cursor — complementary, not replacement.	A-tier. No reason not to use it if you're on Figma. Not worth switching for.	S-tier for multilingual video. If you sell courses or speak at events, this is a cheat code.	A-tier. Rising fast. If you can tolerate the UX, quality per dollar is best-in-class.
Link	Open →	Open →	Open →	Open →