Compare AI tools

	Claude Code S	Figma AI A	ChatGPT Operator B	Hex A
Tagline	Anthropic's CLI agent. Opus-powered, operates on your repo directly.	AI features baked into the design tool you already use.	OpenAI's browser agent. Clicks and types on websites for you.	Modern data notebook with Magic AI assistant.
Category	Coding	Design	Agents	Data
Pricing	Part of Claude Pro/Max/Team plans	Included with Figma plans	Included with ChatGPT Pro $200/mo	Free + $28+/user/mo
Best for	Developers who want an agent, not autocomplete. Large refactors, tests, docs.	Designers already on Figma.	Power users willing to pay $200/mo for a browser bot.	Data teams at startups + enterprises.
Strengths	Runs locally, edits your actual files Strong on large codebases with 1M context Great at multi-step tasks	First drafts with Make Designs Rename/rearrange layers automatically Natural language asset search	Actually uses websites — fills forms, clicks, checks out Built into ChatGPT Good for repetitive web tasks	SQL + Python + no-code in one notebook Magic AI writes queries + viz for you Team-grade collaboration
Weaknesses	Terminal-based — learning curve Can't be used without Claude subscription	Features vary by plan + region Still rolling out	Slow vs doing it yourself Breaks on complex auth flows $200/mo gate	Overkill for casual users Enterprise pricing
Kai's verdict	S-tier if you live in the terminal. Different shape than Cursor — complementary, not replacement.	A-tier. No reason not to use it if you're on Figma. Not worth switching for.	B-tier. Still early. Manus is more flexible for less money.	A-tier for data teams. S-tier if you already live in SQL + Python.
Link	Open →	Open →	Open →	Open →