Compare AI tools

	Claude Code S	Adobe Firefly A	Kling A	Figma AI A
Tagline	Anthropic's CLI agent. Opus-powered, operates on your repo directly.	Commercially safe image gen, deeply integrated with Photoshop.	Kuaishou's video model. The surprise standout.	AI features baked into the design tool you already use.
Category	Coding	Image	Video	Design
Pricing	Part of Claude Pro/Max/Team plans	Free + included with Creative Cloud	Credit-based, free trial	Included with Figma plans
Best for	Developers who want an agent, not autocomplete. Large refactors, tests, docs.	Anyone in Creative Cloud. Brands that need copyright clarity.	Anyone who wants top-tier video quality for less.	Designers already on Figma.
Strengths	Runs locally, edits your actual files Strong on large codebases with 1M context Great at multi-step tasks	Trained on licensed content — commercially safe Generative Fill in Photoshop is incredible Native to Adobe ecosystem	Very strong motion + physics Often beats Runway on realism Great price	First drafts with Make Designs Rename/rearrange layers automatically Natural language asset search
Weaknesses	Terminal-based — learning curve Can't be used without Claude subscription	Aesthetic ceiling below Midjourney Tied to Adobe subscription	UX is rough for English speakers Queue times	Features vary by plan + region Still rolling out
Kai's verdict	S-tier if you live in the terminal. Different shape than Cursor — complementary, not replacement.	S-tier inside Photoshop (Generative Fill). B-tier standalone.	A-tier. Rising fast. If you can tolerate the UX, quality per dollar is best-in-class.	A-tier. No reason not to use it if you're on Figma. Not worth switching for.
Link	Open →	Open →	Open →	Open →