Compare AI tools

	Claude Code S	Galileo AI B	DALL-E 3 B	Figma AI A
Tagline	Anthropic's CLI agent. Opus-powered, operates on your repo directly.	Prompt to UI design. Figma-ready outputs.	OpenAI's image model. Built into ChatGPT Plus.	AI features baked into the design tool you already use.
Category	Coding	Design	Image	Design
Pricing	Part of Claude Pro/Max/Team plans	Free trial + paid plans	Included with ChatGPT Plus $20/mo	Included with Figma plans
Best for	Developers who want an agent, not autocomplete. Large refactors, tests, docs.	Designers brainstorming first drafts.	ChatGPT Plus users who want images without paying extra.	Designers already on Figma.
Strengths	Runs locally, edits your actual files Strong on large codebases with 1M context Great at multi-step tasks	Prompt-to-UI with real layouts Exports to Figma Faster than hand-designing from scratch	Excellent prompt understanding Built into ChatGPT — no extra subscription Good at composition + concepts	First drafts with Make Designs Rename/rearrange layers automatically Natural language asset search
Weaknesses	Terminal-based — learning curve Can't be used without Claude subscription	Output needs designer polish Pricing unclear / changes often	Aesthetic ceiling below Midjourney + Ideogram Text rendering worse than Ideogram No fine control	Features vary by plan + region Still rolling out
Kai's verdict	S-tier if you live in the terminal. Different shape than Cursor — complementary, not replacement.	B-tier. Useful for first drafts. v0 is the better bet for shipping code.	B-tier standalone, A-tier value if you already pay ChatGPT. Don't pay for it separately.	A-tier. No reason not to use it if you're on Figma. Not worth switching for.
Link	Open →	Open →	Open →	Open →