Compare AI tools

	Claude Code S	Galileo AI B	Gemini A	Claude S
Tagline	Anthropic's CLI agent. Opus-powered, operates on your repo directly.	Prompt to UI design. Figma-ready outputs.	Google's answer. Best integrated with Workspace + free for a lot.	Anthropic's flagship — best reasoning + longest useful context.
Category	Coding	Design	Chatbots	Chatbots
Pricing	Part of Claude Pro/Max/Team plans	Free trial + paid plans	Free + $20/mo Advanced (bundled with 2TB Drive)	Free + $20/mo Pro + team/enterprise
Best for	Developers who want an agent, not autocomplete. Large refactors, tests, docs.	Designers brainstorming first drafts.	Anyone already on Google, research tasks, summarizing long documents.	Long writing, code, careful thinking, documents over 50 pages.
Strengths	Runs locally, edits your actual files Strong on large codebases with 1M context Great at multi-step tasks	Prompt-to-UI with real layouts Exports to Figma Faster than hand-designing from scratch	Native Google Workspace integration Very long context (1M+) Deep Research feature Free tier is generous	Best-in-class writing + nuanced reasoning 1M context on Opus Artifacts for code/docs Lowest hallucination rate in my testing
Weaknesses	Terminal-based — learning curve Can't be used without Claude subscription	Output needs designer polish Pricing unclear / changes often	Writing quality trails Claude Over-refusals on edge content UI is cluttered	Image generation is weak No native web search on all tiers
Kai's verdict	S-tier if you live in the terminal. Different shape than Cursor — complementary, not replacement.	B-tier. Useful for first drafts. v0 is the better bet for shipping code.	A-tier. The Deep Research feature is genuinely useful. Don't sleep on it if you're already paying Google.	S-tier for reasoning and writing. If you only pay for one chatbot, pay for this one — especially for long work.
Link	Open →	Open →	Open →	Open →