Compare AI tools

	Claude Code S	Galileo AI B	Gemini A	Claude Agent SDK S
Tagline	Anthropic's CLI agent. Opus-powered, operates on your repo directly.	Prompt to UI design. Figma-ready outputs.	Google's answer. Best integrated with Workspace + free for a lot.	Anthropic's SDK for building your own agents on Claude.
Category	Coding	Design	Chatbots	Agents
Pricing	Part of Claude Pro/Max/Team plans	Free trial + paid plans	Free + $20/mo Advanced (bundled with 2TB Drive)	API usage + SDK is free
Best for	Developers who want an agent, not autocomplete. Large refactors, tests, docs.	Designers brainstorming first drafts.	Anyone already on Google, research tasks, summarizing long documents.	Developers building custom agents for their own company/product.
Strengths	Runs locally, edits your actual files Strong on large codebases with 1M context Great at multi-step tasks	Prompt-to-UI with real layouts Exports to Figma Faster than hand-designing from scratch	Native Google Workspace integration Very long context (1M+) Deep Research feature Free tier is generous	Production-grade agent primitives Built on Claude (best reasoning) Full control — build exactly what you need
Weaknesses	Terminal-based — learning curve Can't be used without Claude subscription	Output needs designer polish Pricing unclear / changes often	Writing quality trails Claude Over-refusals on edge content UI is cluttered	Developer-only You build the UI
Kai's verdict	S-tier if you live in the terminal. Different shape than Cursor — complementary, not replacement.	B-tier. Useful for first drafts. v0 is the better bet for shipping code.	A-tier. The Deep Research feature is genuinely useful. Don't sleep on it if you're already paying Google.	S-tier for builders. The right primitives. What Kai is built on under the hood.
Link	Open →	Open →	Open →	Open →