Compare AI tools

	Claude Code S	GitHub Copilot B	Galileo AI B	Runway S
Tagline	Anthropic's CLI agent. Opus-powered, operates on your repo directly.	Microsoft/GitHub's autocomplete. Deep VS Code + JetBrains integration.	Prompt to UI design. Figma-ready outputs.	The pro's AI video tool. Gen-4 is the current bar.
Category	coding	coding	design	video
Pricing	Part of Claude Pro/Max/Team plans	Free (limited) + $10/mo Pro + $19/mo Business	Free trial + paid plans	Free + $15-$95/mo
Best for	Developers who want an agent, not autocomplete. Large refactors, tests, docs.	Teams with GitHub already. Devs who don't want to change IDEs.	Designers brainstorming first drafts.	Marketing video, pitch decks, b-roll, creative shorts.
Strengths	Runs locally, edits your actual files Strong on large codebases with 1M context Great at multi-step tasks	Great enterprise story Works in your existing IDE Chat + autocomplete	Prompt-to-UI with real layouts Exports to Figma Faster than hand-designing from scratch	Most mature video workflow Character consistency via Act-One Gen-4 quality is production-grade
Weaknesses	Terminal-based — learning curve Can't be used without Claude subscription	Less agentic than Cursor/Claude Code Model quality varies	Output needs designer polish Pricing unclear / changes often	Expensive at scale Still needs post-editing
Kai's verdict	S-tier if you live in the terminal. Different shape than Cursor — complementary, not replacement.	B-tier. Solid for autocomplete but the category moved past it. Pick Cursor unless you can't.	B-tier. Useful for first drafts. v0 is the better bet for shipping code.	S-tier. Market leader with reason. Start here for serious video.
Link	Open →	Open →	Open →	Open →