Compare AI tools

	Claude Code S	Grok A	Figma AI A	Gemini A
Tagline	Anthropic's CLI agent. Opus-powered, operates on your repo directly.	xAI's chatbot. Real-time X/Twitter data + fewer refusals.	AI features baked into the design tool you already use.	Google's answer. Best integrated with Workspace + free for a lot.
Category	Coding	Chatbots	Design	Chatbots
Pricing	Part of Claude Pro/Max/Team plans	Free + $30/mo SuperGrok + included with X Premium	Included with Figma plans	Free + $20/mo Advanced (bundled with 2TB Drive)
Best for	Developers who want an agent, not autocomplete. Large refactors, tests, docs.	Breaking news, live event tracking, users already on X.	Designers already on Figma.	Anyone already on Google, research tasks, summarizing long documents.
Strengths	Runs locally, edits your actual files Strong on large codebases with 1M context Great at multi-step tasks	Live access to X posts for real-time events Less restrictive on edgy questions Fast inference on Grok-3 and up	First drafts with Make Designs Rename/rearrange layers automatically Natural language asset search	Native Google Workspace integration Very long context (1M+) Deep Research feature Free tier is generous
Weaknesses	Terminal-based — learning curve Can't be used without Claude subscription	Writing quality trails Claude/ChatGPT Political bias debates Ecosystem is just X	Features vary by plan + region Still rolling out	Writing quality trails Claude Over-refusals on edge content UI is cluttered
Kai's verdict	S-tier if you live in the terminal. Different shape than Cursor — complementary, not replacement.	A-tier for real-time. B-tier for everything else. Worth checking when news breaks.	A-tier. No reason not to use it if you're on Figma. Not worth switching for.	A-tier. The Deep Research feature is genuinely useful. Don't sleep on it if you're already paying Google.
Link	Open →	Open →	Open →	Open →