Compare AI tools
Side-by-side: what they do, what they cost, what Kai actually thinks. Pass up to 4 tools via ?tools=claude,chatgpt,gemini.
Pick tools (4 selected)
Coding
Image
Productivity
Writing
Marketing
Claude Code S | Luma Dream Machine A | Elicit S | Devin A | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tagline | Anthropic's CLI agent. Opus-powered, operates on your repo directly. | Smooth, cinematic motion. Image-to-video specialist. | AI research assistant for academic literature. | Cognition Labs' autonomous coding engineer. |
| Category | Coding | Video | Research | Agents |
| Pricing | Part of Claude Pro/Max/Team plans | Free + $10-$500/mo | Free + $12-$42/mo | $500/mo |
| Best for | Developers who want an agent, not autocomplete. Large refactors, tests, docs. | Photographers animating stills, cinematic b-roll. | Grad students, researchers, anyone doing literature reviews. | Engineering teams offloading tickets. Ops/platform work. |
| Strengths |
|
|
|
|
| Weaknesses |
|
|
|
|
| Kai's verdict | S-tier if you live in the terminal. Different shape than Cursor — complementary, not replacement. | A-tier. Best for cinematic image-to-video. Pair with Runway for coverage. | S-tier for academic research. Nothing else comes close for systematic reviews. | A-tier for the right use case. Not for solo devs. If you manage engineers, try one license. |
| Link | Open → | Open → | Open → | Open → |