Compare AI tools
Side-by-side: what they do, what they cost, what Kai actually thinks. Pass up to 4 tools via
?tools=claude,chatgpt,gemini.Pick tools (4 selected)
coding
image
productivity
writing
marketing
Claude Code S | Luma Dream Machine A | GitHub Copilot B | Figma AI A | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tagline | Anthropic's CLI agent. Opus-powered, operates on your repo directly. | Smooth, cinematic motion. Image-to-video specialist. | Microsoft/GitHub's autocomplete. Deep VS Code + JetBrains integration. | AI features baked into the design tool you already use. |
| Category | coding | video | coding | design |
| Pricing | Part of Claude Pro/Max/Team plans | Free + $10-$500/mo | Free (limited) + $10/mo Pro + $19/mo Business | Included with Figma plans |
| Best for | Developers who want an agent, not autocomplete. Large refactors, tests, docs. | Photographers animating stills, cinematic b-roll. | Teams with GitHub already. Devs who don't want to change IDEs. | Designers already on Figma. |
| Strengths |
|
|
|
|
| Weaknesses |
|
|
|
|
| Kai's verdict | S-tier if you live in the terminal. Different shape than Cursor — complementary, not replacement. | A-tier. Best for cinematic image-to-video. Pair with Runway for coverage. | B-tier. Solid for autocomplete but the category moved past it. Pick Cursor unless you can't. | A-tier. No reason not to use it if you're on Figma. Not worth switching for. |
| Link | Open → | Open → | Open → | Open → |