Compare AI tools

	Claude Code S	ChatGPT Operator B	Figma AI A	Hex A
Tagline	Anthropic's CLI agent. Opus-powered, operates on your repo directly.	OpenAI's browser agent. Clicks and types on websites for you.	AI features baked into the design tool you already use.	Modern data notebook with Magic AI assistant.
Category	Coding	Agents	Design	Data
Pricing	Part of Claude Pro/Max/Team plans	Included with ChatGPT Pro $200/mo	Included with Figma plans	Free + $28+/user/mo
Best for	Developers who want an agent, not autocomplete. Large refactors, tests, docs.	Power users willing to pay $200/mo for a browser bot.	Designers already on Figma.	Data teams at startups + enterprises.
Strengths	Runs locally, edits your actual files Strong on large codebases with 1M context Great at multi-step tasks	Actually uses websites — fills forms, clicks, checks out Built into ChatGPT Good for repetitive web tasks	First drafts with Make Designs Rename/rearrange layers automatically Natural language asset search	SQL + Python + no-code in one notebook Magic AI writes queries + viz for you Team-grade collaboration
Weaknesses	Terminal-based — learning curve Can't be used without Claude subscription	Slow vs doing it yourself Breaks on complex auth flows $200/mo gate	Features vary by plan + region Still rolling out	Overkill for casual users Enterprise pricing
Kai's verdict	S-tier if you live in the terminal. Different shape than Cursor — complementary, not replacement.	B-tier. Still early. Manus is more flexible for less money.	A-tier. No reason not to use it if you're on Figma. Not worth switching for.	A-tier for data teams. S-tier if you already live in SQL + Python.
Link	Open →	Open →	Open →	Open →