Compare AI tools

	Cline A	Recraft S	GitHub Copilot B	Kling A
Tagline	Open-source VS Code agent. Reads + writes + runs.	Vector + raster AI for designers. Actually controls the output.	Microsoft/GitHub's autocomplete. Deep VS Code + JetBrains integration.	Kuaishou's video model. The surprise standout.
Category	Coding	Image	Coding	Video
Pricing	Free (open source) + your API costs	Free + $12-$48/mo	Free (limited) + $10/mo Pro + $19/mo Business	Credit-based, free trial
Best for	VS Code users who want agentic coding without changing IDEs.	Designers, brand teams, anyone needing vector output or tight style control.	Teams with GitHub already. Devs who don't want to change IDEs.	Anyone who wants top-tier video quality for less.
Strengths	Free extension for VS Code Plan + Act modes Model-agnostic (Claude, GPT, local) Sees terminal output and iterates	Exports SVG vectors — rare in AI image gen Strong style control + consistency Brand kit for consistent outputs	Great enterprise story Works in your existing IDE Chat + autocomplete	Very strong motion + physics Often beats Runway on realism Great price
Weaknesses	Can burn tokens fast if not watched Less polished than Cursor	Less hyped than Midjourney Learning curve for non-designers	Less agentic than Cursor/Claude Code Model quality varies	UX is rough for English speakers Queue times
Kai's verdict	A-tier. Best free agentic option in VS Code. Use with Claude for best results.	S-tier for designers. The only one that takes vectors seriously.	B-tier. Solid for autocomplete but the category moved past it. Pick Cursor unless you can't.	A-tier. Rising fast. If you can tolerate the UX, quality per dollar is best-in-class.
Link	Open →	Open →	Open →	Open →