Compare AI tools

	Cursor S	Claude Code S	Cline A	Gemini A
Tagline	VS Code fork that made AI coding actually work.	Anthropic's CLI agent. Opus-powered, operates on your repo directly.	Open-source VS Code agent. Reads + writes + runs.	Google's answer. Best integrated with Workspace + free for a lot.
Category	coding	coding	coding	chat
Pricing	Free + $20/mo Pro + $40/mo Business	Part of Claude Pro/Max/Team plans	Free (open source) + your API costs	Free + $20/mo Advanced (bundled with 2TB Drive)
Best for	Developers. Non-developers who want to ship working code.	Developers who want an agent, not autocomplete. Large refactors, tests, docs.	VS Code users who want agentic coding without changing IDEs.	Anyone already on Google, research tasks, summarizing long documents.
Strengths	Tab completion feels like mind-reading Composer for multi-file edits Runs Claude, GPT, Gemini — you pick	Runs locally, edits your actual files Strong on large codebases with 1M context Great at multi-step tasks	Free extension for VS Code Plan + Act modes Model-agnostic (Claude, GPT, local) Sees terminal output and iterates	Native Google Workspace integration Very long context (1M+) Deep Research feature Free tier is generous
Weaknesses	Can feel overwhelming for non-coders Expensive at scale	Terminal-based — learning curve Can't be used without Claude subscription	Can burn tokens fast if not watched Less polished than Cursor	Writing quality trails Claude Over-refusals on edge content UI is cluttered
Kai's verdict	S-tier for coding. If you write code of any kind, this pays back the $20 in a day.	S-tier if you live in the terminal. Different shape than Cursor — complementary, not replacement.	A-tier. Best free agentic option in VS Code. Use with Claude for best results.	A-tier. The Deep Research feature is genuinely useful. Don't sleep on it if you're already paying Google.
Link	Open →	Open →	Open →	Open →