Compare AI tools

	Cursor S	Claude Code S	Fathom S	Luma Dream Machine A
Tagline	VS Code fork that made AI coding actually work.	Anthropic's CLI agent. Opus-powered, operates on your repo directly.	Meeting notes, free forever for individuals.	Smooth, cinematic motion. Image-to-video specialist.
Category	coding	coding	meeting	video
Pricing	Free + $20/mo Pro + $40/mo Business	Part of Claude Pro/Max/Team plans	Free for individuals + $15-$29/user/mo teams	Free + $10-$500/mo
Best for	Developers. Non-developers who want to ship working code.	Developers who want an agent, not autocomplete. Large refactors, tests, docs.	Solo operators, freelancers, small teams on a budget.	Photographers animating stills, cinematic b-roll.
Strengths	Tab completion feels like mind-reading Composer for multi-file edits Runs Claude, GPT, Gemini — you pick	Runs locally, edits your actual files Strong on large codebases with 1M context Great at multi-step tasks	Unlimited free tier for solo use Strong summaries + action items Works in Zoom, Meet, Teams	Best image-to-video in the category Great camera motion control Ray 2 model produces striking shots
Weaknesses	Can feel overwhelming for non-coders Expensive at scale	Terminal-based — learning curve Can't be used without Claude subscription	Bot-joining model Team features gated	Prompt fidelity below Runway Queue times on free tier
Kai's verdict	S-tier for coding. If you write code of any kind, this pays back the $20 in a day.	S-tier if you live in the terminal. Different shape than Cursor — complementary, not replacement.	S-tier for solo + free. The best free option, hands down.	A-tier. Best for cinematic image-to-video. Pair with Runway for coverage.
Link	Open →	Open →	Open →	Open →