Compare AI tools

	Cursor S	Claude Code S	Gamma A	Hume AI A
Tagline	VS Code fork that made AI coding actually work.	Anthropic's CLI agent. Opus-powered, operates on your repo directly.	AI slide decks that don't look AI-generated.	Voice AI that reads + expresses emotion.
Category	coding	coding	productivity	voice
Pricing	Free + $20/mo Pro + $40/mo Business	Part of Claude Pro/Max/Team plans	Free + $10-$20/mo	Free tier + pay-as-you-go
Best for	Developers. Non-developers who want to ship working code.	Developers who want an agent, not autocomplete. Large refactors, tests, docs.	Pitch decks, proposals, internal presentations — fast.	Therapy apps, customer service, any voice agent where emotion matters.
Strengths	Tab completion feels like mind-reading Composer for multi-file edits Runs Claude, GPT, Gemini — you pick	Runs locally, edits your actual files Strong on large codebases with 1M context Great at multi-step tasks	Strong templates Decks, docs, webpages Doesn't look generic	Detects + mirrors emotional tone EVI (Empathic Voice Interface) feels different Expressive voice output
Weaknesses	Can feel overwhelming for non-coders Expensive at scale	Terminal-based — learning curve Can't be used without Claude subscription	Locked into Gamma's format Export quality varies	Niche use case Pricing ramps fast
Kai's verdict	S-tier for coding. If you write code of any kind, this pays back the $20 in a day.	S-tier if you live in the terminal. Different shape than Cursor — complementary, not replacement.	A-tier. Best of a boring category. Use it for first drafts, then edit in Keynote if high-stakes.	A-tier in its niche. The only one that actually gets emotion right.
Link	Open →	Open →	Open →	Open →