Compare AI tools
Side-by-side: what they do, what they cost, what Kai actually thinks. Pass up to 4 tools via
?tools=claude,chatgpt,gemini.Pick tools (4 selected)
coding
image
productivity
writing
marketing
Cursor S | Claude Code S | Genspark A | Figma AI A | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tagline | VS Code fork that made AI coding actually work. | Anthropic's CLI agent. Opus-powered, operates on your repo directly. | AI agent for deep search. Generates Sparkpages — full mini-reports. | AI features baked into the design tool you already use. |
| Category | coding | coding | research | design |
| Pricing | Free + $20/mo Pro + $40/mo Business | Part of Claude Pro/Max/Team plans | Free + $25/mo Plus | Included with Figma plans |
| Best for | Developers. Non-developers who want to ship working code. | Developers who want an agent, not autocomplete. Large refactors, tests, docs. | Travel planning, shopping comparisons, deep research where you want an artifact back. | Designers already on Figma. |
| Strengths |
|
|
|
|
| Weaknesses |
|
|
|
|
| Kai's verdict | S-tier for coding. If you write code of any kind, this pays back the $20 in a day. | S-tier if you live in the terminal. Different shape than Cursor — complementary, not replacement. | A-tier. Bet on this one — the Sparkpage format is genuinely new. | A-tier. No reason not to use it if you're on Figma. Not worth switching for. |
| Link | Open → | Open → | Open → | Open → |