Compare AI tools

	Cursor S	Claude Code S	Kling A	Luma Dream Machine A
Tagline	VS Code fork that made AI coding actually work.	Anthropic's CLI agent. Opus-powered, operates on your repo directly.	Kuaishou's video model. The surprise standout.	Smooth, cinematic motion. Image-to-video specialist.
Category	coding	coding	video	video
Pricing	Free + $20/mo Pro + $40/mo Business	Part of Claude Pro/Max/Team plans	Credit-based, free trial	Free + $10-$500/mo
Best for	Developers. Non-developers who want to ship working code.	Developers who want an agent, not autocomplete. Large refactors, tests, docs.	Anyone who wants top-tier video quality for less.	Photographers animating stills, cinematic b-roll.
Strengths	Tab completion feels like mind-reading Composer for multi-file edits Runs Claude, GPT, Gemini — you pick	Runs locally, edits your actual files Strong on large codebases with 1M context Great at multi-step tasks	Very strong motion + physics Often beats Runway on realism Great price	Best image-to-video in the category Great camera motion control Ray 2 model produces striking shots
Weaknesses	Can feel overwhelming for non-coders Expensive at scale	Terminal-based — learning curve Can't be used without Claude subscription	UX is rough for English speakers Queue times	Prompt fidelity below Runway Queue times on free tier
Kai's verdict	S-tier for coding. If you write code of any kind, this pays back the $20 in a day.	S-tier if you live in the terminal. Different shape than Cursor — complementary, not replacement.	A-tier. Rising fast. If you can tolerate the UX, quality per dollar is best-in-class.	A-tier. Best for cinematic image-to-video. Pair with Runway for coverage.
Link	Open →	Open →	Open →	Open →