Compare AI tools

	Cursor S	Claude Code S	OpenAI Voice / Realtime S	Figma AI A
Tagline	VS Code fork that made AI coding actually work.	Anthropic's CLI agent. Opus-powered, operates on your repo directly.	ChatGPT's voice + the Realtime API for developers.	AI features baked into the design tool you already use.
Category	coding	coding	voice	design
Pricing	Free + $20/mo Pro + $40/mo Business	Part of Claude Pro/Max/Team plans	Voice included with ChatGPT Plus; Realtime API by usage	Included with Figma plans
Best for	Developers. Non-developers who want to ship working code.	Developers who want an agent, not autocomplete. Large refactors, tests, docs.	Voice chat users, developers building voice agents on OpenAI.	Designers already on Figma.
Strengths	Tab completion feels like mind-reading Composer for multi-file edits Runs Claude, GPT, Gemini — you pick	Runs locally, edits your actual files Strong on large codebases with 1M context Great at multi-step tasks	Advanced Voice Mode feels genuinely conversational Realtime API enables true two-way voice apps Built into ChatGPT	First drafts with Make Designs Rename/rearrange layers automatically Natural language asset search
Weaknesses	Can feel overwhelming for non-coders Expensive at scale	Terminal-based — learning curve Can't be used without Claude subscription	Pricey for production apps Less voice variety than ElevenLabs Platform lock-in	Features vary by plan + region Still rolling out
Kai's verdict	S-tier for coding. If you write code of any kind, this pays back the $20 in a day.	S-tier if you live in the terminal. Different shape than Cursor — complementary, not replacement.	S-tier for conversation. A-tier for TTS. Complement to ElevenLabs, not replacement.	A-tier. No reason not to use it if you're on Figma. Not worth switching for.
Link	Open →	Open →	Open →	Open →