Compare AI tools

	Cursor S	Claude Code S	ChatGPT Operator B	Claude S
Tagline	VS Code fork that made AI coding actually work.	Anthropic's CLI agent. Opus-powered, operates on your repo directly.	OpenAI's browser agent. Clicks and types on websites for you.	Anthropic's flagship — best reasoning + longest useful context.
Category	coding	coding	agents	chat
Pricing	Free + $20/mo Pro + $40/mo Business	Part of Claude Pro/Max/Team plans	Included with ChatGPT Pro $200/mo	Free + $20/mo Pro + team/enterprise
Best for	Developers. Non-developers who want to ship working code.	Developers who want an agent, not autocomplete. Large refactors, tests, docs.	Power users willing to pay $200/mo for a browser bot.	Long writing, code, careful thinking, documents over 50 pages.
Strengths	Tab completion feels like mind-reading Composer for multi-file edits Runs Claude, GPT, Gemini — you pick	Runs locally, edits your actual files Strong on large codebases with 1M context Great at multi-step tasks	Actually uses websites — fills forms, clicks, checks out Built into ChatGPT Good for repetitive web tasks	Best-in-class writing + nuanced reasoning 1M context on Opus Artifacts for code/docs Lowest hallucination rate in my testing
Weaknesses	Can feel overwhelming for non-coders Expensive at scale	Terminal-based — learning curve Can't be used without Claude subscription	Slow vs doing it yourself Breaks on complex auth flows $200/mo gate	Image generation is weak No native web search on all tiers
Kai's verdict	S-tier for coding. If you write code of any kind, this pays back the $20 in a day.	S-tier if you live in the terminal. Different shape than Cursor — complementary, not replacement.	B-tier. Still early. Manus is more flexible for less money.	S-tier for reasoning and writing. If you only pay for one chatbot, pay for this one — especially for long work.
Link	Open →	Open →	Open →	Open →