Compare AI tools
Side-by-side: what they do, what they cost, what Kai actually thinks. Pass up to 4 tools via
?tools=claude,chatgpt,gemini.Pick tools (4 selected)
coding
image
productivity
writing
marketing
Cursor S | Claude Code S | Sora A | DeepSeek S | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tagline | VS Code fork that made AI coding actually work. | Anthropic's CLI agent. Opus-powered, operates on your repo directly. | OpenAI's video model. Long clips, cinematic quality. | Chinese open-weight powerhouse. Crazy cheap, genuinely smart. |
| Category | coding | coding | video | chat |
| Pricing | Free + $20/mo Pro + $40/mo Business | Part of Claude Pro/Max/Team plans | Included with ChatGPT Plus/Pro | Free web + ultra-cheap API (~$0.14/M input tokens) |
| Best for | Developers. Non-developers who want to ship working code. | Developers who want an agent, not autocomplete. Large refactors, tests, docs. | ChatGPT subscribers experimenting with cinematic shots. | Developers + cost-conscious builders. Anyone fine with self-hosting. |
| Strengths |
|
|
|
|
| Weaknesses |
|
|
|
|
| Kai's verdict | S-tier for coding. If you write code of any kind, this pays back the $20 in a day. | S-tier if you live in the terminal. Different shape than Cursor — complementary, not replacement. | A-tier. Amazing when it works, frustrating when it doesn't. Runway still more reliable for pros. | S-tier for price/performance. A-tier for consumer use. If you build apps, this is the budget pick. |
| Link | Open → | Open → | Open → | Open → |