Compare AI tools

	Cursor S	DALL-E 3 B	Claude Code S	Adobe Firefly A
Tagline	VS Code fork that made AI coding actually work.	OpenAI's image model. Built into ChatGPT Plus.	Anthropic's CLI agent. Opus-powered, operates on your repo directly.	Commercially safe image gen, deeply integrated with Photoshop.
Category	coding	image	coding	image
Pricing	Free + $20/mo Pro + $40/mo Business	Included with ChatGPT Plus $20/mo	Part of Claude Pro/Max/Team plans	Free + included with Creative Cloud
Best for	Developers. Non-developers who want to ship working code.	ChatGPT Plus users who want images without paying extra.	Developers who want an agent, not autocomplete. Large refactors, tests, docs.	Anyone in Creative Cloud. Brands that need copyright clarity.
Strengths	Tab completion feels like mind-reading Composer for multi-file edits Runs Claude, GPT, Gemini — you pick	Excellent prompt understanding Built into ChatGPT — no extra subscription Good at composition + concepts	Runs locally, edits your actual files Strong on large codebases with 1M context Great at multi-step tasks	Trained on licensed content — commercially safe Generative Fill in Photoshop is incredible Native to Adobe ecosystem
Weaknesses	Can feel overwhelming for non-coders Expensive at scale	Aesthetic ceiling below Midjourney + Ideogram Text rendering worse than Ideogram No fine control	Terminal-based — learning curve Can't be used without Claude subscription	Aesthetic ceiling below Midjourney Tied to Adobe subscription
Kai's verdict	S-tier for coding. If you write code of any kind, this pays back the $20 in a day.	B-tier standalone, A-tier value if you already pay ChatGPT. Don't pay for it separately.	S-tier if you live in the terminal. Different shape than Cursor — complementary, not replacement.	S-tier inside Photoshop (Generative Fill). B-tier standalone.
Link	Open →	Open →	Open →	Open →