Compare AI tools
Side-by-side: what they do, what they cost, what Kai actually thinks. Pass up to 4 tools via
?tools=claude,chatgpt,gemini.Pick tools (4 selected)
coding
image
productivity
writing
marketing
Cursor S | DeepSeek S | Flux (Black Forest Labs) A | GitHub Copilot B | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tagline | VS Code fork that made AI coding actually work. | Chinese open-weight powerhouse. Crazy cheap, genuinely smart. | Open weights + strong photorealism. The open-source answer. | Microsoft/GitHub's autocomplete. Deep VS Code + JetBrains integration. |
| Category | coding | chat | image | coding |
| Pricing | Free + $20/mo Pro + $40/mo Business | Free web + ultra-cheap API (~$0.14/M input tokens) | API + open weights (Schnell is Apache 2.0) | Free (limited) + $10/mo Pro + $19/mo Business |
| Best for | Developers. Non-developers who want to ship working code. | Developers + cost-conscious builders. Anyone fine with self-hosting. | Developers + power users who want control and privacy. | Teams with GitHub already. Devs who don't want to change IDEs. |
| Strengths |
|
|
|
|
| Weaknesses |
|
|
|
|
| Kai's verdict | S-tier for coding. If you write code of any kind, this pays back the $20 in a day. | S-tier for price/performance. A-tier for consumer use. If you build apps, this is the budget pick. | A-tier. S-tier if you self-host. The reason open-source image gen matters. | B-tier. Solid for autocomplete but the category moved past it. Pick Cursor unless you can't. |
| Link | Open → | Open → | Open → | Open → |