Compare AI tools

	Cursor S	Gemini A	Adobe Firefly A	Claude Code S
Tagline	VS Code fork that made AI coding actually work.	Google's answer. Best integrated with Workspace + free for a lot.	Commercially safe image gen, deeply integrated with Photoshop.	Anthropic's CLI agent. Opus-powered, operates on your repo directly.
Category	coding	chat	image	coding
Pricing	Free + $20/mo Pro + $40/mo Business	Free + $20/mo Advanced (bundled with 2TB Drive)	Free + included with Creative Cloud	Part of Claude Pro/Max/Team plans
Best for	Developers. Non-developers who want to ship working code.	Anyone already on Google, research tasks, summarizing long documents.	Anyone in Creative Cloud. Brands that need copyright clarity.	Developers who want an agent, not autocomplete. Large refactors, tests, docs.
Strengths	Tab completion feels like mind-reading Composer for multi-file edits Runs Claude, GPT, Gemini — you pick	Native Google Workspace integration Very long context (1M+) Deep Research feature Free tier is generous	Trained on licensed content — commercially safe Generative Fill in Photoshop is incredible Native to Adobe ecosystem	Runs locally, edits your actual files Strong on large codebases with 1M context Great at multi-step tasks
Weaknesses	Can feel overwhelming for non-coders Expensive at scale	Writing quality trails Claude Over-refusals on edge content UI is cluttered	Aesthetic ceiling below Midjourney Tied to Adobe subscription	Terminal-based — learning curve Can't be used without Claude subscription
Kai's verdict	S-tier for coding. If you write code of any kind, this pays back the $20 in a day.	A-tier. The Deep Research feature is genuinely useful. Don't sleep on it if you're already paying Google.	S-tier inside Photoshop (Generative Fill). B-tier standalone.	S-tier if you live in the terminal. Different shape than Cursor — complementary, not replacement.
Link	Open →	Open →	Open →	Open →