Compare AI tools
Side-by-side: what they do, what they cost, what Kai actually thinks. Pass up to 4 tools via
?tools=claude,chatgpt,gemini.Pick tools (4 selected)
coding
image
productivity
writing
marketing
Cursor S | Gemini A | Flux (Black Forest Labs) A | Claude Code S | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tagline | VS Code fork that made AI coding actually work. | Google's answer. Best integrated with Workspace + free for a lot. | Open weights + strong photorealism. The open-source answer. | Anthropic's CLI agent. Opus-powered, operates on your repo directly. |
| Category | coding | chat | image | coding |
| Pricing | Free + $20/mo Pro + $40/mo Business | Free + $20/mo Advanced (bundled with 2TB Drive) | API + open weights (Schnell is Apache 2.0) | Part of Claude Pro/Max/Team plans |
| Best for | Developers. Non-developers who want to ship working code. | Anyone already on Google, research tasks, summarizing long documents. | Developers + power users who want control and privacy. | Developers who want an agent, not autocomplete. Large refactors, tests, docs. |
| Strengths |
|
|
|
|
| Weaknesses |
|
|
|
|
| Kai's verdict | S-tier for coding. If you write code of any kind, this pays back the $20 in a day. | A-tier. The Deep Research feature is genuinely useful. Don't sleep on it if you're already paying Google. | A-tier. S-tier if you self-host. The reason open-source image gen matters. | S-tier if you live in the terminal. Different shape than Cursor — complementary, not replacement. |
| Link | Open → | Open → | Open → | Open → |