Compare AI tools
Side-by-side: what they do, what they cost, what Kai actually thinks. Pass up to 4 tools via
?tools=claude,chatgpt,gemini.Pick tools (4 selected)
coding
image
productivity
writing
marketing
Cursor S | Luma Dream Machine A | Devin A | Claude Code S | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tagline | VS Code fork that made AI coding actually work. | Smooth, cinematic motion. Image-to-video specialist. | Cognition Labs' autonomous coding engineer. | Anthropic's CLI agent. Opus-powered, operates on your repo directly. |
| Category | coding | video | agents | coding |
| Pricing | Free + $20/mo Pro + $40/mo Business | Free + $10-$500/mo | $500/mo | Part of Claude Pro/Max/Team plans |
| Best for | Developers. Non-developers who want to ship working code. | Photographers animating stills, cinematic b-roll. | Engineering teams offloading tickets. Ops/platform work. | Developers who want an agent, not autocomplete. Large refactors, tests, docs. |
| Strengths |
|
|
|
|
| Weaknesses |
|
|
|
|
| Kai's verdict | S-tier for coding. If you write code of any kind, this pays back the $20 in a day. | A-tier. Best for cinematic image-to-video. Pair with Runway for coverage. | A-tier for the right use case. Not for solo devs. If you manage engineers, try one license. | S-tier if you live in the terminal. Different shape than Cursor — complementary, not replacement. |
| Link | Open → | Open → | Open → | Open → |