Compare AI tools
Side-by-side: what they do, what they cost, what Kai actually thinks. Pass up to 4 tools via
?tools=claude,chatgpt,gemini.Pick tools (4 selected)
coding
image
productivity
writing
marketing
Cursor S | Luma Dream Machine A | GitHub Copilot B | Manus S | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tagline | VS Code fork that made AI coding actually work. | Smooth, cinematic motion. Image-to-video specialist. | Microsoft/GitHub's autocomplete. Deep VS Code + JetBrains integration. | Autonomous AI agent that actually finishes tasks. |
| Category | coding | video | coding | agents |
| Pricing | Free + $20/mo Pro + $40/mo Business | Free + $10-$500/mo | Free (limited) + $10/mo Pro + $19/mo Business | Free tier + $39-$199/mo |
| Best for | Developers. Non-developers who want to ship working code. | Photographers animating stills, cinematic b-roll. | Teams with GitHub already. Devs who don't want to change IDEs. | People who want to hand off tasks entirely — trip planning, research, spreadsheet building. |
| Strengths |
|
|
|
|
| Weaknesses |
|
|
|
|
| Kai's verdict | S-tier for coding. If you write code of any kind, this pays back the $20 in a day. | A-tier. Best for cinematic image-to-video. Pair with Runway for coverage. | B-tier. Solid for autocomplete but the category moved past it. Pick Cursor unless you can't. | S-tier in the agent category. The first one I'd give to a non-technical friend. |
| Link | Open → | Open → | Open → | Open → |