Compare AI tools

	Cursor S	v0 S	Claude Code S	Elicit S
Tagline	VS Code fork that made AI coding actually work.	Vercel's AI-powered UI generator. Prompt to shadcn component.	Anthropic's CLI agent. Opus-powered, operates on your repo directly.	AI research assistant for academic literature.
Category	coding	design	coding	research
Pricing	Free + $20/mo Pro + $40/mo Business	Free + $20/mo	Part of Claude Pro/Max/Team plans	Free + $12-$42/mo
Best for	Developers. Non-developers who want to ship working code.	Frontend devs, PMs prototyping UIs, anyone on Next.js.	Developers who want an agent, not autocomplete. Large refactors, tests, docs.	Grad students, researchers, anyone doing literature reviews.
Strengths	Tab completion feels like mind-reading Composer for multi-file edits Runs Claude, GPT, Gemini — you pick	Ships working React + Tailwind code Shadcn/ui native One-click deploy to Vercel	Runs locally, edits your actual files Strong on large codebases with 1M context Great at multi-step tasks	Searches 125M+ papers Extracts + synthesizes findings across papers Systematic review workflow
Weaknesses	Can feel overwhelming for non-coders Expensive at scale	Best for shadcn stack Iterating can be fiddly	Terminal-based — learning curve Can't be used without Claude subscription	Academic-only Can hallucinate citations — verify everything
Kai's verdict	S-tier for coding. If you write code of any kind, this pays back the $20 in a day.	S-tier. If you're on Vercel/shadcn, this is cheating.	S-tier if you live in the terminal. Different shape than Cursor — complementary, not replacement.	S-tier for academic research. Nothing else comes close for systematic reviews.
Link	Open →	Open →	Open →	Open →