Compare AI tools

	DALL-E 3 B	Claude Code S	Grok A	Figma AI A
Tagline	OpenAI's image model. Built into ChatGPT Plus.	Anthropic's CLI agent. Opus-powered, operates on your repo directly.	xAI's chatbot. Real-time X/Twitter data + fewer refusals.	AI features baked into the design tool you already use.
Category	Image	Coding	Chatbots	Design
Pricing	Included with ChatGPT Plus $20/mo	Part of Claude Pro/Max/Team plans	Free + $30/mo SuperGrok + included with X Premium	Included with Figma plans
Best for	ChatGPT Plus users who want images without paying extra.	Developers who want an agent, not autocomplete. Large refactors, tests, docs.	Breaking news, live event tracking, users already on X.	Designers already on Figma.
Strengths	Excellent prompt understanding Built into ChatGPT — no extra subscription Good at composition + concepts	Runs locally, edits your actual files Strong on large codebases with 1M context Great at multi-step tasks	Live access to X posts for real-time events Less restrictive on edgy questions Fast inference on Grok-3 and up	First drafts with Make Designs Rename/rearrange layers automatically Natural language asset search
Weaknesses	Aesthetic ceiling below Midjourney + Ideogram Text rendering worse than Ideogram No fine control	Terminal-based — learning curve Can't be used without Claude subscription	Writing quality trails Claude/ChatGPT Political bias debates Ecosystem is just X	Features vary by plan + region Still rolling out
Kai's verdict	B-tier standalone, A-tier value if you already pay ChatGPT. Don't pay for it separately.	S-tier if you live in the terminal. Different shape than Cursor — complementary, not replacement.	A-tier for real-time. B-tier for everything else. Worth checking when news breaks.	A-tier. No reason not to use it if you're on Figma. Not worth switching for.
Link	Open →	Open →	Open →	Open →