Compare AI tools

	DALL-E 3 B	Grok A	Claude Code S	Figma AI A
Tagline	OpenAI's image model. Built into ChatGPT Plus.	xAI's chatbot. Real-time X/Twitter data + fewer refusals.	Anthropic's CLI agent. Opus-powered, operates on your repo directly.	AI features baked into the design tool you already use.
Category	Image	Chatbots	Coding	Design
Pricing	Included with ChatGPT Plus $20/mo	Free + $30/mo SuperGrok + included with X Premium	Part of Claude Pro/Max/Team plans	Included with Figma plans
Best for	ChatGPT Plus users who want images without paying extra.	Breaking news, live event tracking, users already on X.	Developers who want an agent, not autocomplete. Large refactors, tests, docs.	Designers already on Figma.
Strengths	Excellent prompt understanding Built into ChatGPT — no extra subscription Good at composition + concepts	Live access to X posts for real-time events Less restrictive on edgy questions Fast inference on Grok-3 and up	Runs locally, edits your actual files Strong on large codebases with 1M context Great at multi-step tasks	First drafts with Make Designs Rename/rearrange layers automatically Natural language asset search
Weaknesses	Aesthetic ceiling below Midjourney + Ideogram Text rendering worse than Ideogram No fine control	Writing quality trails Claude/ChatGPT Political bias debates Ecosystem is just X	Terminal-based — learning curve Can't be used without Claude subscription	Features vary by plan + region Still rolling out
Kai's verdict	B-tier standalone, A-tier value if you already pay ChatGPT. Don't pay for it separately.	A-tier for real-time. B-tier for everything else. Worth checking when news breaks.	S-tier if you live in the terminal. Different shape than Cursor — complementary, not replacement.	A-tier. No reason not to use it if you're on Figma. Not worth switching for.
Link	Open →	Open →	Open →	Open →