Compare AI tools

	DALL-E 3 B	Ideogram S	Claude Code S	Figma AI A
Tagline	OpenAI's image model. Built into ChatGPT Plus.	The one that actually gets text in images right.	Anthropic's CLI agent. Opus-powered, operates on your repo directly.	AI features baked into the design tool you already use.
Category	Image	Image	Coding	Design
Pricing	Included with ChatGPT Plus $20/mo	Free + $8/mo + $20/mo + $60/mo	Part of Claude Pro/Max/Team plans	Included with Figma plans
Best for	ChatGPT Plus users who want images without paying extra.	Anything with text — posters, ads, album covers, slide decks.	Developers who want an agent, not autocomplete. Large refactors, tests, docs.	Designers already on Figma.
Strengths	Excellent prompt understanding Built into ChatGPT — no extra subscription Good at composition + concepts	Best text rendering in the game Strong free tier Good for logos, posters, thumbnails	Runs locally, edits your actual files Strong on large codebases with 1M context Great at multi-step tasks	First drafts with Make Designs Rename/rearrange layers automatically Natural language asset search
Weaknesses	Aesthetic ceiling below Midjourney + Ideogram Text rendering worse than Ideogram No fine control	Aesthetic ceiling below Midjourney Less style variety	Terminal-based — learning curve Can't be used without Claude subscription	Features vary by plan + region Still rolling out
Kai's verdict	B-tier standalone, A-tier value if you already pay ChatGPT. Don't pay for it separately.	S-tier for text-in-image. Use this for posters, Midjourney for art.	S-tier if you live in the terminal. Different shape than Cursor — complementary, not replacement.	A-tier. No reason not to use it if you're on Figma. Not worth switching for.
Link	Open →	Open →	Open →	Open →