Compare AI tools

	DALL-E 3 B	Google Veo A	Claude Code S	GitHub Copilot B
Tagline	OpenAI's image model. Built into ChatGPT Plus.	Google's video model. Baked into Gemini + YouTube Shorts.	Anthropic's CLI agent. Opus-powered, operates on your repo directly.	Microsoft/GitHub's autocomplete. Deep VS Code + JetBrains integration.
Category	image	video	coding	coding
Pricing	Included with ChatGPT Plus $20/mo	Included with Gemini Advanced $20/mo + YouTube creator tools	Part of Claude Pro/Max/Team plans	Free (limited) + $10/mo Pro + $19/mo Business
Best for	ChatGPT Plus users who want images without paying extra.	Gemini Advanced users, YouTube Shorts creators.	Developers who want an agent, not autocomplete. Large refactors, tests, docs.	Teams with GitHub already. Devs who don't want to change IDEs.
Strengths	Excellent prompt understanding Built into ChatGPT — no extra subscription Good at composition + concepts	Included with Gemini Advanced YouTube Shorts native integration Strong prompt understanding	Runs locally, edits your actual files Strong on large codebases with 1M context Great at multi-step tasks	Great enterprise story Works in your existing IDE Chat + autocomplete
Weaknesses	Aesthetic ceiling below Midjourney + Ideogram Text rendering worse than Ideogram No fine control	Still catching up on quality vs Kling/Runway Less control than pros need	Terminal-based — learning curve Can't be used without Claude subscription	Less agentic than Cursor/Claude Code Model quality varies
Kai's verdict	B-tier standalone, A-tier value if you already pay ChatGPT. Don't pay for it separately.	A-tier if you already pay Gemini. B-tier standalone.	S-tier if you live in the terminal. Different shape than Cursor — complementary, not replacement.	B-tier. Solid for autocomplete but the category moved past it. Pick Cursor unless you can't.
Link	Open →	Open →	Open →	Open →