Compare AI tools

	Devin A	Claude Code S	Galileo AI B	Figma AI A
Tagline	Cognition Labs' autonomous coding engineer.	Anthropic's CLI agent. Opus-powered, operates on your repo directly.	Prompt to UI design. Figma-ready outputs.	AI features baked into the design tool you already use.
Category	Agents	Coding	Design	Design
Pricing	$500/mo	Part of Claude Pro/Max/Team plans	Free trial + paid plans	Included with Figma plans
Best for	Engineering teams offloading tickets. Ops/platform work.	Developers who want an agent, not autocomplete. Large refactors, tests, docs.	Designers brainstorming first drafts.	Designers already on Figma.
Strengths	Works like an engineer — takes Slack tasks, opens PRs Handles multi-hour engineering work Reports back with what it did	Runs locally, edits your actual files Strong on large codebases with 1M context Great at multi-step tasks	Prompt-to-UI with real layouts Exports to Figma Faster than hand-designing from scratch	First drafts with Make Designs Rename/rearrange layers automatically Natural language asset search
Weaknesses	Expensive Best for well-scoped tasks Not for solo hobbyists	Terminal-based — learning curve Can't be used without Claude subscription	Output needs designer polish Pricing unclear / changes often	Features vary by plan + region Still rolling out
Kai's verdict	A-tier for the right use case. Not for solo devs. If you manage engineers, try one license.	S-tier if you live in the terminal. Different shape than Cursor — complementary, not replacement.	B-tier. Useful for first drafts. v0 is the better bet for shipping code.	A-tier. No reason not to use it if you're on Figma. Not worth switching for.
Link	Open →	Open →	Open →	Open →