Compare AI tools

	Devin A	Cursor TypeScript SDK A	GitHub Copilot B	Ollama S
Tagline	Cognition Labs' autonomous coding engineer.	Wire Cursor's full coding-agent runtime into your own apps, scripts, and CI/CD pipelines with a few lines of TypeScript.	Microsoft/GitHub's autocomplete. Deep VS Code + JetBrains integration.	Run LLMs locally. One-line install, GUI optional.
Category	Agents	Dev Platform	Coding	Dev Platform
Pricing	$500/mo	Token-based; requires Cursor plan (Pro from $20/mo). Composer 2 at $0.50/$2.50 per M tokens (in/out); fast variant $1.50/$7.50 per M tokens.	Free (limited) + $10/mo Pro + $19/mo Business	Free + open source
Best for	Engineering teams offloading tickets. Ops/platform work.	Engineering teams who already use Cursor and want to embed its coding-agent runtime into CI/CD pipelines, backend services, or internal developer tools without building agent infrastructure from scratch.	Teams with GitHub already. Devs who don't want to change IDEs.	Devs wanting offline/local LLMs for privacy or experimentation.
Strengths	Works like an engineer — takes Slack tasks, opens PRs Handles multi-hour engineering work Reports back with what it did	Same runtime as the Cursor IDE — no reinventing sandboxing, context management, or model routing Three execution modes: local machine, Cursor cloud VMs (isolated per-agent), or self-hosted workers for air-gapped teams Cloud agents are durable — keep running even if your laptop sleeps or connection drops, and can open PRs automatically on finish Full harness included: codebase indexing, MCP servers, skills, hooks, and multi-agent delegation via subagents Visible in Cursor's Agents Window — programmatic runs can be inspected or taken over manually in the IDE	Great enterprise story Works in your existing IDE Chat + autocomplete	Run Llama, Mistral, Qwen, etc. on your laptop Simple CLI + API Hardware-aware (picks the right quant)
Weaknesses	Expensive Best for well-scoped tasks Not for solo hobbyists	TypeScript-only SDK — no official Python or other language bindings at launch Public beta status means API surface and pricing can shift without much notice (Cursor has a track record of surprise pricing changes) Cloud VM costs layer on top of subscription credits, making cost estimation non-trivial at scale	Less agentic than Cursor/Claude Code Model quality varies	Needs beefy laptop for larger models Speed way behind cloud APIs
Kai's verdict	A-tier for the right use case. Not for solo devs. If you manage engineers, try one license.	If your team is already in the Cursor ecosystem, this is a genuinely compelling way to turn ad-hoc AI coding sessions into durable, automated workflows — but the beta label and Cursor's history with opaque pricing mean you'll want to set hard budget guardrails before going to production. (Verdict pending Phi's full review.)	B-tier. Solid for autocomplete but the category moved past it. Pick Cursor unless you can't.	S-tier for local inference. If you care about privacy or want to tinker, install this today.
Link	Open →	Open →	Open →	Open →