Compare AI tools

	Devin A	Lex A	Claude Code S	Figma AI A
Tagline	Cognition Labs' autonomous coding engineer.	Google Docs with an AI collaborator baked in.	Anthropic's CLI agent. Opus-powered, operates on your repo directly.	AI features baked into the design tool you already use.
Category	Agents	Writing	Coding	Design
Pricing	$500/mo	Free + $12/mo	Part of Claude Pro/Max/Team plans	Included with Figma plans
Best for	Engineering teams offloading tickets. Ops/platform work.	Essays, long-form drafts, thinking on the page.	Developers who want an agent, not autocomplete. Large refactors, tests, docs.	Designers already on Figma.
Strengths	Works like an engineer — takes Slack tasks, opens PRs Handles multi-hour engineering work Reports back with what it did	Clean writing UX — distraction-free +++ prompt triggers AI help Collaboration + AI feedback together	Runs locally, edits your actual files Strong on large codebases with 1M context Great at multi-step tasks	First drafts with Make Designs Rename/rearrange layers automatically Natural language asset search
Weaknesses	Expensive Best for well-scoped tasks Not for solo hobbyists	Less feature-rich than Google Docs AI ceiling below dedicated tools	Terminal-based — learning curve Can't be used without Claude subscription	Features vary by plan + region Still rolling out
Kai's verdict	A-tier for the right use case. Not for solo devs. If you manage engineers, try one license.	A-tier. Beautiful UX. The writing app I'd pick if I only wrote long-form.	S-tier if you live in the terminal. Different shape than Cursor — complementary, not replacement.	A-tier. No reason not to use it if you're on Figma. Not worth switching for.
Link	Open →	Open →	Open →	Open →