Compare AI tools

	Devin A	Skye A	Gemini A	GitHub Copilot B
Tagline	Cognition Labs' autonomous coding engineer.	An agentic iPhone home screen that replaces your static icon grid with AI widgets that proactively surface health, calendar, finance, and local context — without you having to open a single app.	Google's answer. Best integrated with Workspace + free for a lot.	Microsoft/GitHub's autocomplete. Deep VS Code + JetBrains integration.
Category	Agents	Agents	Chatbots	Coding
Pricing	$500/mo	Waitlist / Beta (pricing not yet disclosed)	Free + $20/mo Advanced (bundled with 2TB Drive)	Free (limited) + $10/mo Pro + $19/mo Business
Best for	Engineering teams offloading tickets. Ops/platform work.	iPhone power users who are frustrated that Siri is still reactive and want their home screen to actually anticipate their day.	Anyone already on Google, research tasks, summarizing long documents.	Teams with GitHub already. Devs who don't want to change IDEs.
Strengths	Works like an engineer — takes Slack tasks, opens PRs Handles multi-hour engineering work Reports back with what it did	Ambient, proactive intelligence delivered via native iOS widgets — no app-switching required Cross-domain context: health, calendar, email, finances, and local recommendations in one layer Works within iOS permission model (no jailbreak or sideloading), making App Store approval plausible Strong pre-launch signal: 25k+ waitlist and backing from a16z, True Ventures, and SV Angel	Native Google Workspace integration Very long context (1M+) Deep Research feature Free tier is generous	Great enterprise story Works in your existing IDE Chat + autocomplete
Weaknesses	Expensive Best for well-scoped tasks Not for solo hobbyists	Still pre-launch / beta — zero proven track record and no public pricing yet iPhone-only by design, which immediately locks out half the smartphone market Battery drain and privacy concerns from constant ambient context scanning are real and unresolved	Writing quality trails Claude Over-refusals on edge content UI is cluttered	Less agentic than Cursor/Claude Code Model quality varies
Kai's verdict	A-tier for the right use case. Not for solo devs. If you manage engineers, try one license.	The concept is genuinely compelling — turning the home screen into a living AI layer is a smarter bet than yet another chat interface — but this is vaporware until it ships publicly and we see whether Apple's sandbox lets it breathe. (Verdict pending Phi's full review.)	A-tier. The Deep Research feature is genuinely useful. Don't sleep on it if you're already paying Google.	B-tier. Solid for autocomplete but the category moved past it. Pick Cursor unless you can't.
Link	Open →	Open →	Open →	Open →