Compare AI tools

	Elicit S	Galileo AI B	DALL-E 3 B	GitHub Copilot B
Tagline	AI research assistant for academic literature.	Prompt to UI design. Figma-ready outputs.	OpenAI's image model. Built into ChatGPT Plus.	Microsoft/GitHub's autocomplete. Deep VS Code + JetBrains integration.
Category	Research	Design	Image	Coding
Pricing	Free + $12-$42/mo	Free trial + paid plans	Included with ChatGPT Plus $20/mo	Free (limited) + $10/mo Pro + $19/mo Business
Best for	Grad students, researchers, anyone doing literature reviews.	Designers brainstorming first drafts.	ChatGPT Plus users who want images without paying extra.	Teams with GitHub already. Devs who don't want to change IDEs.
Strengths	Searches 125M+ papers Extracts + synthesizes findings across papers Systematic review workflow	Prompt-to-UI with real layouts Exports to Figma Faster than hand-designing from scratch	Excellent prompt understanding Built into ChatGPT — no extra subscription Good at composition + concepts	Great enterprise story Works in your existing IDE Chat + autocomplete
Weaknesses	Academic-only Can hallucinate citations — verify everything	Output needs designer polish Pricing unclear / changes often	Aesthetic ceiling below Midjourney + Ideogram Text rendering worse than Ideogram No fine control	Less agentic than Cursor/Claude Code Model quality varies
Kai's verdict	S-tier for academic research. Nothing else comes close for systematic reviews.	B-tier. Useful for first drafts. v0 is the better bet for shipping code.	B-tier standalone, A-tier value if you already pay ChatGPT. Don't pay for it separately.	B-tier. Solid for autocomplete but the category moved past it. Pick Cursor unless you can't.
Link	Open →	Open →	Open →	Open →