Compare AI tools

	Fathom S	GitHub Copilot B	Genspark A	Claude S
Tagline	Meeting notes, free forever for individuals.	Microsoft/GitHub's autocomplete. Deep VS Code + JetBrains integration.	AI agent for deep search. Generates Sparkpages — full mini-reports.	Anthropic's flagship — best reasoning + longest useful context.
Category	Meetings	Coding	Research	Chatbots
Pricing	Free for individuals + $15-$29/user/mo teams	Free (limited) + $10/mo Pro + $19/mo Business	Free + $25/mo Plus	Free + $20/mo Pro + team/enterprise
Best for	Solo operators, freelancers, small teams on a budget.	Teams with GitHub already. Devs who don't want to change IDEs.	Travel planning, shopping comparisons, deep research where you want an artifact back.	Long writing, code, careful thinking, documents over 50 pages.
Strengths	Unlimited free tier for solo use Strong summaries + action items Works in Zoom, Meet, Teams	Great enterprise story Works in your existing IDE Chat + autocomplete	Sparkpages = curated multi-source mini-articles Agent can book, compare, shop Autopilot agent for long tasks	Best-in-class writing + nuanced reasoning 1M context on Opus Artifacts for code/docs Lowest hallucination rate in my testing
Weaknesses	Bot-joining model Team features gated	Less agentic than Cursor/Claude Code Model quality varies	Early-stage — rough edges Less reliable than Perplexity for simple questions	Image generation is weak No native web search on all tiers
Kai's verdict	S-tier for solo + free. The best free option, hands down.	B-tier. Solid for autocomplete but the category moved past it. Pick Cursor unless you can't.	A-tier. Bet on this one — the Sparkpage format is genuinely new.	S-tier for reasoning and writing. If you only pay for one chatbot, pay for this one — especially for long work.
Link	Open →	Open →	Open →	Open →